Mack Beggs begs the question - can HE be allowed to beat a SHE? Semantics 101

Let's ignore the obvious issues of whether somebody on steroids, or testosterone, or on DRUGS in general, should be allowed to play sports.

Let's discuss the journalistic aspect of the MACK BEGGS story. What do you notice about the write-up?

You see that MACK BEGGS (male name) who looks very much like a MAN, is referred to as HE.

"HE beat Chelsea Sanchez - who HE beat for the title in 2017."

So tell me, Associated Press, if you are referring to MACK BEGGS as HE, what the hell is HE doing wrestling a SHE?

It would make sense for MACK to be wrestling males who LOOK LIKE HIM. What's the argument, when MACK is called HE? MACK's penis or lack of same, should not be an issue, should it? This isn't arm wrestling. It certainly isn't penis wrestling. It's about HIS muscular arms and legs.

What if a male wrestler had an unfortunate accident involving an egg beater, or very hot soup or something? Would HE announce he was now only going to wrestle GIRLS?

It's a bit strange how we choose when and how to be liberal. Remember Rachel Dolezal? She "identified as black." Now she identifies as unemployed. And yet, if she "identifies as male," she can walk into a men's room most anywhere.

So MACK BEGGS identifies as a girl when HE wants to win a trophy.

Congrats, MACK. Most bullies are male. Beating up a girl; now you qualify.