Saturday, December 31, 2016

D.L. joins Steve Martin in TWITTER HELL

D.L. Hughley isn't quite a "hacky black," doing a lot of easy jokes about that difference between white folks and brothers. But he goes where the money is, doesn't he? He doesn't appear on Bill Maher's show to NOT give the black perspective. Cosby (whose downfall was that he wasn't a "hacky black" like Burress is) pioneered the idea that black comics should be allowed to be funny without making race the topic of every joke. Maybe D.L. should remember that.

Was there really a need to make ANY joke out of Debbie Reynolds' death? ("Too Soon" IS the rueful motto most comics know by heart). Was there any need to make it a "how white folks differ from black folks" deal?

Say what?

And so it was, that D.L. took the heat off Steve Martin (the Carrie Fisher non-joke sincere tribute) a few days ago. The Twitterverse began to turn on D.L. and question what the hell he was trying to do.

The answer is that comics are iconoclasts. Also compulsive class clowns.

He either figured it was ridiculous for people to mope about Debbie's literal "heartbreak," and was going to do a sarcastic slap, OR, he had that compulsive need to make a comic statement out of anything and everything big in the news.

"Too Soon." There's a time to just shut the fuck up.

Comics often don't know there IS such a time. They take up the challenge of "say something funny about this tragedy." They forget Steve Allen's scholarly bit of comic math: "Comedy is tragedy + time."

If Kinison was still alive, he would've felt compelled to snicker to his audience of drunks and bikers about poor Debbie.

Something like: "Debbie Reynolds...heh heh...I think I saw this before in a necrophile porn film: DEBBIE DOES CARDIAC ARREST! Heh heh...just family values, guys. Heh heh...somebody said to me, Sam, could you make a really bad taste joke about America's sweetheart and...uh...necrophile porn? OH OHHHHHHHHH!!!! I just did, man!"

If Gabe Kaplan or Robert Klein was just starting out, maybe one or the other would be compelled to put a Jewish spin on the story, like D.L. tried a black spin:"I'm Jewish, if my sister died, my mother wouldn't have a heart attack. She'd say, 'How come YOU are still alive?' She'd noodge ME into having a heart attack for her!"

Something like that.

I feel a bit sorry for D.L. and all comics who have a monumental fail like this. When they get off a good one, all they get is laughter. The joke is forgotten the next day. Tell a bad one, and there's massive resentment.

It's not much different in any entertainment media. Talking about black spin, Serena Williams might put a spin on a drop shot, and land it 99 times out of 100. The one time it hits the net? Everyone is saying she's losing it. She's through. It might even be the only photo from the match that gets into print.

Too bad Hughley isn't more like Burress, who I'm sure was too busy doing his "observational humor" in a small urban nightclub, chuckling about rap singer booty, to think up a gag about a white icon from the 60's dropping dead in grief over her daughter, the "Star Wars" icon.

A new danger these days is indeed, TWITTER. Funny people can't try out a joke on an audience first. Or, don't realize that jokes don't always work well on the page. It's possible D.L. quipped that line to some pal of his, who chuckled and said, "Post it on TWITTER!" Written and not spoken...no, not funny at all.

We've seen all kinds of celebs rush to TWITTER and post something they either have to apologize for an hour later. Comics have to delete the bomb, or live with the damage.

For me, the most offensive thing is the video that opened up on the news page.

WHAT does Debbie Reynolds, in a clip from "Singing in the Rain," have to do with D.L.'s unfortunate misfire? NOTHING.

It forces me to study and study more and more about APPS and BLOCKERS and finding a way to prevent idiot websites from bothering me with VIDEO POP-UPS that instantly begin to play when I do NOT want them to.

I get the idea this nefarious, tasteless crap of inserting VIDEOS into news stories, is to keep me "on the page" longer, so that there's more website revenue.

CUT IT OUT.

I'm here to READ A STORY. If I wanted to watch a film clip I'd go to YouTube.

Thursday, December 29, 2016

Carrie Fisher and the Corrupt Slimy, HOLLYWOOD WALK OF FAME

"They can take their star and I'll tell them what to do with it."

I'm paraphrasing Moe Howard of the Three Stooges.

In his lifetime, The Three Stooges were DENIED a star on the "Hollywood Walk of Fame."

What a poke in the eye it was. Tourists strolling the "Hollywood Walk of Fame" couldn't see MOE, but they could see:

Renee Adoree, Art Acord, Brian Aherne, Philip Ahn, Adrienne Ames, Don Alvarado, Mary Anderson, Heather Angel, Michael Ansara, Dorothy Arzner and Nils Asther.

I'm restricting myself only to movie stars who were contemporaries of Moe, and to the first letter of the alphabet. What an A-list, huh? How many of them have you even heard of? Yes, Philip Ahn was a capable actor usually restricted to "wise Asian" roles, and Renee Adoree was adorable, and Adrienne Ames was very sexy. But The Three Stooges had the longest contract in the history of Columbia Pictures. The shorts were getting huge ratings via TV re-runs. Did the "Hall of Fame" need to be convinced by sales of VHS tapes and DVDs after Moe was dead?

By the time The Three Stooges got their star, the only ex-Stooge at the ceremony was Joe Besser.

The only reason they even GOT a star is that Stooge fans ponied up the money to pay for it.

The dirty little secret about the "Hollywood Walk of Fame" is that it's a con game. A hokey "Board of Directors" holds up the artists or the studios for ransom.

You've heard of vanity publishing? This is a vanity tourist trap.

Does the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame demand payment from inductees? Of course not. The Academy Awards doesn't send a bill to the winners, saying, "Your statue cost us $400 to make out of pewter." But the "Hollywood Walk of Fame," which brings huge bucks to all the souvenir shops that line the sidewalks, and brings in a fortune in taxes on that junk, now DEMANDS $30,000 payment.

I was surprised that Carrie Fisher didn't have a star already.

You'd think the "Star Wars" franchise would've been happy to pay the $30,000. Or did George Lucas and his pals figure Carrie should've reached into her purse and paid for this ego boost?

Variety just reported that even though she's now deceased, she can STILL be nominated for a star, and get a star. BUT...somebody has to come up with the $30,000.

These days, the "Hollywood Vanity Sidewalk" is littered with mediocre names who bought their way in.

I've checked the nomination procedure. Foremost, these hucksters want to know that IF the nomination is approved, $30,000 will be paid. The person doing the nominating has to put MONEY where that mouth is.

Let's take a look at some of the mediocre idiots who have a star on the "Hollywood Vanity Sidewalk."

Scanning the B-list of names beginning with that letter, there's:

....crappy pop jerks The Backstreet Boys and Boys2Men, irritating radio tenor Kenny Baker, hack director William "One Shot" Beaudine, TV soap opera guy John Beradino, pudgy and annoying sports announcer Chris Berman, unreal "Big Bird" a muppet, Jimmy Boyd the pest who sang "I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus," earache Teresa Brewer, mildly amusing C&W sidekick Smiley Burnette, one of many many purveyors of boring traveling and animal documentaries Bill Burrud, the uninteresting LeVar Burton, and the woman who played Oliver Hardy's shrewish wife in a few L&H shorts Mae Busch.

Carrie Fisher should've been nominated long ago, and approved. And the city of Los Angeles should've been for her star.

I could list dozens if not hundreds more: disc jockeys, quiz show hosts, one-hit wonders, odious producers who mostly chased actresses around desks, and other egomaniacs who PAID THE $30,000 to tell the world they matter. Yes, Donald Trump has his star, for hosting a stupid reality TV show.

The sad thing isn't that some geeky bunch will have go on GOFUNDME to make sure their precious Princess Leia gets the star they think she should have, but that there actually are dozens upon dozens of STARS who not only deserve the honor, but could benefit from it. Fisher was a star with or without the Hollywood Walk of Fame, but there are others, no longer working who'd like to be remembered as they drift off into the D-list obscurity of Facebook. They'd like to be validated. They'd like to be able to not just say, "I had a hit TV show in the 60's" or "I had a few singles that topped the charts in the 70's," but..."I have a STAR in the Hollywood Walk of Fame."

For many, $30,000 is just too much money. Some of them only get social security, and to help pay the rent they rely on tottering to a memorabilia show a few times a year. There, they get $20 to sign a photo for some fat goof who smells like a sidewalk in Weehawken, New Jersey.

Wednesday, December 28, 2016

Steve Martin Twitter-Bullied for Carrie Fisher compliment

Steve Martin?

He started out as "the jerk." He was this "wild and crazy" goofball. It turned out, he was a creative and talented actor ("Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid" and "All of Me" were early examples). He was the opposite of his image: a serious, intelligent guy. An art collector. An expert banjo player. A novelist.

I could say:

When I was a young man, Steve Martin was my favorite goofball comic. He turned out to be witty and bright as well."

Anything wrong with that?

Read on.

Too bad Steve Martin deleted the Tweet, but I think I know why.

He's a sensitive guy and he was hurt at being misunderstood.

So he withdrew the comment.

His next reaction was probably anger. WHY am I being misunderstood for a compliment??

That would be another reason to pull the Tweet, and be tempted to shut the account down entirely.

He doesn't need this shit.

Kneejerk morons who want to find fault are all too happy to rant on Twitter and criticize and bully people they don't even know.

So, a pretty woman turns out to be smart. We say the same thing about a baseball player or a boxer. Or a rock star. Or a stand-up comic who became famous for his "arrow the the head" gag, which nobody got as a parody of "lampshade on the head" life-of-the-party assholes.

Celebrities at Steve Martin's level do NOT need Twitter or Facebook. Unless you actually enjoy jousting with morons (John Cleese is one of those), you can make do with a website that explains who you are, what you did, and what you're up to.

I've only met Steve Martin once; I found him to be, yes, a quiet, well-mannered man. I've met Cleese a few times, and he's quite robust and outgoing, and it doesn't surprise me that he'd enjoy topping the bottom-dwellers. But, generally...

...the more "Followers" you have, the greater the risk. Ask John Lennon. Oh, you can't.

The Steve Martin incident is just a minor example of why it's better to take a low profile. You have to be some kind of idiot to be famous and waste your time Tweeting.

Oh. Donald Trump.

Funny, there were much worse Tweets posted after the death of Carrie Fisher. Cinnabon, anyone?

What people quickly learn about Twitter is that it's a good place to offend people and make enemies.

Spike Milligan once said, and he was so right, "When you brush up mediocrity, you brush up venom." People in Armpit, Florida, who've never met anyone more famous than their local meth dealer, can suddenly get the attention of a Steve Martin or a John Cleese, and vent their anger and stupidity at them. After all, saying "I love your work" won't stand out as much as an insult or threat.

Cleese enjoys this crap. Steve Martin obviously does not.

Mediocre people are amazed that rich, famous people actually have the time to fritter about on Twitter, and that seems to make them even more venomous and nasty.

If you don't turn a blind eye to human nature, the Internet itself makes people venomous and nasty, and there are plenty of creeps who have a great time picking on anyone with an opinion on Twitter or an account on Facebook.

From the safety of an anonymous account and a basement in Turkeyface, Florida (it's almost ALWAYS Florida), trolls make themselves feel good by making somebody else feel bad.

PS, about all this praise for Carrie Fisher being a "feminist" and a great actress because she appeared in some moronic sci-fi movies (nobody seems to mention her other acting work or her books). It would be helpful if somewhere in this "too soon" and "so sad" and "RIP" and "love always for Princess Leia" stuff, there would be a line about, "drugs can cause a weakened body and a fatal heart attack." Same thing could be said about George Michael. The lesson isn't that George Michael's forgotten 80's music "will live forever," but rather, that he died some 20 years before his time. The lesson with Carrie Fisher is that as colorful as recounting drug and sex stories are, you may stop talking about them 20 years before your time.

Steve Martin? Play your banjo, collect your art, write your books, act in films, hang out in the real world with your many friends...and don't feed the birdbrains on Twitter.

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

No, Suzy, Spreading the Betty White Vagina Pounding is Wrong

Why do idiots attribute lame jokes to George Carlin and sex jokes to Betty White?

And why do idiots believe this crap is true?

When Carrie Fisher died, "BETTY WHITE" became a trending topic on Twitter. Why? People began joking that she was next, or they hoped she wouldn't be next. This then became an excuse to volunteer a favorite Betty White photo or quote.

Here's Suzy Know-it-All with her own website (how impressive) and gee, she's added her own name to a moronic meme that's been going around and around and around and around for years:

Who could imagine Betty White actually saying that? Doesn't everyone know about SNOPES by now, a website devoted to debunking Internet assholery?

Betty of course denied ever saying anything like that, and added a quotable remark about the INTERNET and FACEBOOK.

Thursday, December 22, 2016

HEY, you dirty guys at the L.A. Times - wanna re-phrase that??

Submitted for your Approval - CHRISTMAS ALBUMS

A Tribute to Zsa Zsa Gabor from Miley Cyrus

It was interesting to see the reaction to Zsa Zsa Gabor's death.

Considering she was a raconteur when Carson hosted the Tonight Show, I didn't think anyone under 40 would even know her name. There's also someone else, Dahhhling, who uses an eccentric accent while flaunting her wealth, and her name is Huffington. Most people of any age would have trouble recalling a single movie she made.

And yet...the media headlined Zsa Zsa's death, and as they usually do, in lieu of actually writing a thoughtful appraisal of the deceased, they reprinted what publicity-hungry stars Tweeted.

Would you believe Viley Virus...er, MILEY CYRUS was one of them?

Here you go...

Always be sincere, whether you mean it or not.

A few of the steal-and-rewrite "news" sites (Decider, Gawker, Huffington-Puffer, Ripper Offer...) had a staffer analyze who Zsa Zsa Gabor was. The line most often used was "she was the Kardashian of her day" or "she pioneered being famous just for being famous."

Kardashian (pick any of 'em, and throw in two Jenners) never made a movie. Gabor did. She made many. They may be forgotten now, but she got good reviews for them.

Oh, you CAN claim that Kim Kardashian made a movie, if you count the porn video that leaked. But Paris Hilton pioneered THAT form of entertainment: the "celebutard" becoming famous through what some would called "a planned publicity-seeking embarrassment."

Gabor was discovered by the opera star Richard Tauber, who put her in an operetta in Vienna. Yes, she could sing. She also became "Miss Hungary," and she emerged in the 50's as the star of "Moulin Rouge," "Lovely To Look At," and "Lili." Yes, she also had husbands and romances, but these came AFTER she was a well-known personality. She wasn't famous because of scandal.

1958 was pretty much her last year of serious film making, which included a minor role in the Orson Welles classic "Touch of Evil" and the lead in "Queen of Outer Space." She survived the 60's and 70's not by twerking, getting involved with a series of grotesque football or basketball players, and using implants to become a caricature of womanhood. She was a kind of a female Liberace (I know, a bit of a redundancy there). She wore attention-getting outfits, and prepared herself with bon mots she could toss to nightclub hosts or the press.

She even had competition from another sister, Eva, who became much more famous to the world through the "Green Acres" TV show. When I was working for London Features as a photographer, it was Eva that I'd see at "must see" parties. Yet, the fascination with Zsa Zsa Gabor continued. She did become almost a parody of herself, but a dignified one.

A surprising word you could use in referencing Zsa Zsa Gabor, is "class." She certainly wasn't as outrageous as Jayne Mansfield was in the 60's, or Edy Williams in the 70's, or the vast array of wardrobe-malfunction Playboy-nude starlets of the past 40 years.

There's Clever and there's CLEVER

When Trump was elected, I offered a Photoshop Tweet. I also sent a copy to my friend J----.

Usually J---- is quick to reply with a LOL or a compliment, but I figured, ok. Either she voted for the guy (!) or she's taking me a bit for granted. I don't respond every time a friend sends me a link to a FYI newspaper article, for example. It gets to be clutter to have "thanks for the heads up" "you're welcome" bouncing back and forth.

A day later, I was compelled to tinker together another Photoshop job. Actually, there was a trending Twitter topic, imagining Broadway shows that Trump & Pence might approve of ("Hamilton" not being one of them). I offered this:

I sent it to my friend (and not mass email it to others). She's not following me on Twitter, after all, doesn't DO Twitter, so I sent it the old fashioned way. But once again, there was no response.

Of course, as Dale Carnegie pointed out, "People are concerned with themselves 24/7." Which is why I do this stuff for myself, and not for money (who's buying anything?). It doesn't faze me if I get a bunch of re-Tweets or "nice comments" or not.

The other day, I got an email from my friend J----, with a big photo attachment, the kind that leads to a warning: "your email is nearly FULL."

She wanted me to see the "clever illustration" a friend of hers created.

Yes, she took the time to forward this to me, and I guess it was a mass emailing to everyone in her address book. It was just too creative not to share.

Like it says in the header, "there's clever and there's CLEVER."

She actually sent this with a little note remarking on how it was a "clever illustration."

It's possible she felt some obligation to help this mediocre no-talent, who probably helps her wash her car or something. She's well known and people routinely try to use her fame or endorsements to try and get attention.

What can I say.

Whether it's a pat on the back or a kick in the balls, you just move on.

We all have different ideas about what's funny and what's clever and what's worth somebody's time. As Donald Trump says, "That's what makes America great!"

Wednesday, December 21, 2016

JERRY LEWIS SCHOOLS AN AMATEUR

No, Huffity-Puffington, it was NOT a trainwreck.

No, Decider and Gawker, and Stealer, and Re-Writer, and all the other silly websites run by Millennial morons making ad money by directing people to YOUTUBE links. This was not "BAD" at all.

In your own idiot language, I'll tell you what it was: WICKED SICK. OK?

Above, you see what Huffity-Puffington wrote. Oooh, TRAINWRECK. What, "Hot Mess" was already taken? How about "AWKWARD?" That's always a good wimpy word to use.

It has to be TRAINWRECK or AWKWARD or HOT MESS parroted by mealy-mouthed Millinial morons who live for "PayPal tip jar" money, podcast nickels and Google-ad dimes. PS, does Huffity-Puffington give more than a dime for a thousand hits on a piece of junk like this, on a page festooned with "please turn off your ad blocker" ads??

If you do bother to go to YouTube and watch, you'll see clear-eyed and coherent Mr. Lewis school a stuttering fool who was obviously reading from questions on paper and being unprofessional.

UNPROFESSIONAL was obvious to Jerry Lewis from the moment this interview began. The interviewer even admitted that he knew things were going badly when Lewis became increasingly annoyed with the long time it was taking to set up the cameras at his Las Vegas home.

You bet. First off, it doesn’t take an hour to set up a shoot. It took them AN HOUR.

Let's note that news cameras INSTANTLY go out on the fly and get the pictures and the sound. Ordinary idiots pointing their phones at you can come up with results pro enough to be upped to YouTube or even picked up by a network.

Speaking of networks, NBC had a crew come over to visit me for an interview. They were set up in under 10 minutes. What did they need? To put a camera on a tripod, plug stuff in, attach a microphone to my lapel...and GET ON WITH IT.

After an hour of delay (and when you're 90, time DOES become even more precious) what happened?

This silly Millennial dweeb began reciting from his sheet of paper, ticking off the questions like it’s a quiz.

No, it's NOT a quiz, Little Boy. It's supposed to be an INTERVIEW. You're supposed to know your subject, and by your demeanor and how you frame the questions, you're supposed to show your subject that you CARE ABOUT THE ANSWERS, and that you're not just crossing questions off your list as part of a parasitic chore.

Which it was. The interviewer here wasn't that interested in Jerry Lewis. Lewis was only a part of the project, which was to interview as many famous older celebrities as possible (including Norman Lear, Dick Van Dyke and Betty White). Lewis was rightly feeling that he was not being respected and his time wasn't valued. He was just one of many being asked a lot of rote, boring questions.

Dick Van Dyke and Betty White are almost professionally "nice." They suffer fools gladly. Jerry Lewis has never been one of those. He's glowered and glared on talk shows. He's given snappy answers to stupid questions. His Q&A when he makes live appearances is almost guaranteed to include big laughs from insulting some boob in the audience for a time-wasting question.

Twerp, understand: Jerry didn't NEED this interview, he granted it because he expected you to be professional and act like you actually cared about his answers. He didn't like getting the impression you were quickly crossing off questions so you could go spend the rest of the budget at the Bunny Ranch getting beaten on the ass with a stalk of celery.

A lot of the questions lent themselves to YES and NO answers, so that’s what happened. Jerry wanted this fool out of his face, as quick as possible.

If the point is to let people know that people over 90 can still be coherent, go film a minute of Jerry on stage. If you want him to go into detail, act like he's special, and that you're grateful he's spending time with you. Apologize if you've delayed him. Understand his mood. Be flexible enough to either deviate from the prepared questions, or find a way of framing them so they're worth answering.

What this confirms is today’s interviewers are abominably amateurish.

The only positive thing I can say about THIS particular puppy, is that he didn’t simply do what so many do these days: toss out a non-question and demand a response. Like: “You’re over 90. Talk about that.” “You worked with Dean Martin. What do you remember?” “You made movies. What was that like?”

It also confirms that Jerry Lewis at 90 isn't much different from Jerry Lewis at 80 or 70 or 60. What you get from this interview is not a "train wreck" but proof that Lewis is still on track, and can be booked for a new movie, a lecture tour, or even a documentary interview.

Is HE going to do all the work for you and give you something memorable even if you're unprofessional? Yes and no!

Sunday, December 18, 2016

Copyrighted Broadcast? Ha! Newspapers use Theft-Loving TWITTER

Here's something newspaper websites can do and that broadcast news can't: STEAL SPORTS CLIPS.

Last night, a trim, ageless-looking Bernard Hopkins (nearly 52 years old) went seven very competitive rounds with Joe Smith Jr (25 years younger). Many thought he was ahead or even, when he found himself up against the ropes and, crouching to avoid punches, through the ropes.

Yes, Smith, the white boxer from New York landed several clean shots. He also landed a questionable final one while Hopkins was halfway through the ropes. You do NOT hit a boxer when he's technically "out of bounds."

The fight could've ended in a disqualification (you do NOT hit somebody "out of bounds") but with Hopkins bitching about his ankle somehow hurting (he actually landed on his shoulders and head), he was counted out for not returning to the ring within 20 seconds.

Almost instantly, people were posting the highlights on TWITTER.

Didn't pay to see the fight? Never pay for premium channels like HBO or Box Nation? No problem!!

Almost instantly, all the website newspapers ran the story. Since almost NONE of them have boxing reporters anymore, they used or re-wrote the Associated Press feed. Or...they simply quoted the result and let TWITTER users, with their STOLEN CLIPS...give the story.

Here's the page from the New York Post, owned by that master of fair play, Rupert Murdoch:

Yes, like dozens upon dozens of other well-known newspaper sites, it was considered, uh, "fair use" to grab stuff off TWITTER, even if it was un-fair use clips from HBO.

What's HBO gonna do about it? Start sending takedown emails at midnight? And who would be on duty? Thanks to flabby Internet law, websites such as TWITTER, GOOGLE and EBAY can do as they please, and merely answer a takedown request in a "reasonable" amount of time.

Chuckles Schumer, where are you? And what happened to Patsy Leahy and his push for copyright protection and Internet sanity?

The Internet is also the Land of 1000 typos, so when some "Decider" or "Gawker" or Huffy-Puffington re-writes the news, don't expect spell-check to help. "Manner," NY POST, not "manor."

But hey, we've got Donald Trump, who spells "unprecedented" as "unpresidented." (PS, my spell check tried to correct my deliberate spelling error! PPS, there's still a glimmer of hope that with the Russian hacking and the twisted Electoral College system, Trump could actually be UN-presidented. How about giving America a month to get the polling booths back and give it another try?)

The interesting twist here is that actual news broadcasts on TV have none of this weird wiggle-room. They are simply prohibited from using clips without permission. PERIOD.

Whether it's the Olympics or a pay-per-view sports event, the sports broadcasters on local news or cable news networks can hardly do more than describe what took place, and MAYBE offer a still photo. No, a TV broadcaster can't say, "Oh, and here's somebody on TWITTER posting an illegal clip of the fight. Let's all look!"

Sunday, November 20, 2016

Rob Schneider and Adam Sandler "Here Comes the Unfunny..."

Nice to see that tiny Rob Schneider has backed off his big blow of balloon juice. After smugly telling the world that "WE" (the Republicans) freed the slaves, he Tweeted a conciliation, and then a salute to the current President.

As Bill Dana used to say, it's nice to see him "play nice."

Especially if you get a lot of angry comments denouncing your stupidity. Lincoln's Republican party has nothing to do with the current Republican party of Dubya Bush or Donald Trump, or their tea-bagger pals with their "Libtard" taunts and their smirky "don't tell me about guns if you kill unborn babies" shit.

Fact is, "freeing the slaves," isn't quite the same thing as giving them the chance to enjoy their lives like everyone else. It didn't happen in the South where there was a thing called "SEGREGATION."

Guess who set about fixing that, Rob. It wasn't Eisenhower and his Republicans. It was JFK and LBJ. Should I be as stupid as you, and Tweet, "The Republicans haven't been this happy since Martin Luther King Jr. was shot?"

I don't think anyone was that thrilled with either Hillary or Donald. Or as Mort Sahl used to say (back when he was funny), "Darwin was Wrong."

The world could use a good laugh. I don't think they'll get any on December 9th.

If I was still editing RAVE (the magazine George Carlin called "The Wall Street Journal" for comedians, and the one John Cleese posed holding), I wouldn't send anyone to cover that show.

But in the spirit of "say something nice about Rob Schneider" and letting the "healing process" begin, I'll point out TWO things. First, despite Ebert's "Your movie sucks," Rob sent the man flowers when he was beginning cancer treatment.

And secondly, "The Hot Chick" didn't suck.

Saturday, November 19, 2016

Tweety Bird: ROB SCHNEIDER, THE RETURN OF THE LITTLEST ASSHOLE

Anyone remember Rob Schneider? The guy who made those awful Douche-bag Bigelow movies? The guy whose tongue had to be surgically removed from Adam Sandler’s asshole? The guy who rivals the bed bug for being the world’s tiniest irritant?

If you have a long, long memory, you might remember when Rob was funny; two minutes on “Saturday Night Live.” He did a pretty good Billy Crystal. He captured Billy’s habit of smiling beatifically at his own punchlines.

Rob also accurately played "the office jerk," in increasingly predictable and annoying sketches. He'd cheerfully stand around the copy machine, belaboring the obvious: "Makin' copies!" If I walked in to use the machine, he’d dub me “The Ron Man,” then “The Ron-inator” then “The Ronmeister” or “Ronzo,” etc. etc. No, not much of a joke.

Probably the funniest thing about Rob Schneider was how film critic Roger Ebert got the better of him. When “Deuce Bigalow Male Gigolo” got roasted by the critics, Rob got on his low horse, and whined that no film critic should judge him. Film critics don't get awards for their work, right?

Roger Ebert wrote: “Speaking in my official capacity as a Pulitzer Prize winner, Mr. Schneider, your movie sucks.”

To be fair "The Hot Chick" didn't suck. It was actually an attempt to do something beyond playing arrogant little creeps. But really, for the past 20 years, the 53 year-old Schneider has consistently failed to make critics laugh. Most normal people simply avoid films with Sandler or Schneider in them. Live and let vomit, you know. If he’s an unpleasant, unfunny, creepy little gnat, so what. You don’t have to see his films, and you know better than to bother.

Twitter, being the last refuge to which a publicity-seeking has-been clings, suddenly saw the re-emergence of Rob Schneider. Was he going to try and be witty? Funny?

Jeez. You have to look in the “comments” section of some troll-loaded forum or newspaper website to see a nastier bit of dumbass self-satisfied jerkery. Instead of "Democrats" I’m surprised he didn’t use “LIBTARDS.” That’s a favorite among the brain-dead.

I guess he wasn't getting anywhere with slightly more normal Tweets, like this one:

I guess Rob figures he might resuscitate his career if he appeals to the Trump fans out there, the ones who smile at nastiness and blockheaded insults. But I think he’s forgotten something. They will turn on him the moment somebody Tweets that his father was JEWISH.

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Robert Vaughn : A Fortunate Life and Not a Scarred Past

I remember the book signing for the late Robert Vaughn.

Book signings are fairly predictable. The author is either in a good mood and allows for a moment of chat, or it's a quick signature, head down. Somebody from the store keeps up a tense whine of "Move the line along, next!"

What was I expecting with Robert Vaughn? A combination of the two. He seemed the type who'd be tolerant for at least a few seconds of adulation or one question, maybe.

My instincts seemed correct when I watched him gracefully do a brief Q&A before the signing. He was polite but distant, and a fanboy question, "What was your favorite Man from UNCLE episode" got the cold, factual response of, "None of them." He was just an actor on the assembly line of a weekly show, and the part wasn't much of a challenge was it?

The brief Q&A almost had me intimidated, but I did want to ask him a question.

It was about the most disturbing and vivid Q&A interview I'd read when I was a kid. It originally appeared in Man's Magazine, March 1964.

At the time, Vaughn was a minor celebrity starring in a TV show called "The Lieutenant." His superstardom was six months away, September of 1964, when "The Man from UNCLE" premiered.

The Q&A was re-published in a book called "Hollywood Uncensored," a paperback that collected various celebrity articles that had appeared in Man's Magazine in 1963 and 1964.

The Vaughn chapter was the most remarkable. The other chapters were written in typical tabloid style. There were quotes from people who knew the star. Maybe some quotes pulled from other articles about the star. There was room for the writer to make assumptions and "color" and slant the story. But the Vaughn piece? Q&A. And fascinating. Vaughn seemed to open up about his disturbed childhood, his early sex life, his shoplifting fun, and most weirdly of all, how his grandparents kept him leashed on a clothesline in the backyard, so he wouldn't wander away or cause trouble.

The piece was titled "The Scarred Past of a Hollywood Actor."

Fast forward over 40 years, and Vaughn was offering up his autobiography. It was called "A Fortunate Life." Really?

I got to Barnes & Noble early, and began to read the chapter on his childhood. I was shocked.

There was NOTHING at all about the backyard or the "goddam rope." NOTHING.

What he'd said in that magazine piece about the incident coloring his life...had he blocked it all out? Was he now presenting himself as well-adjusted and his life a series of mostly "fortunate" incidents and choices? His childhood was actually cheerful and mundane?

When it was my turn to place my book in front of him for personalization (thank you) and signature, I mentioned that I was surprised that the chapter on his childhood was so different from the 1964 interview, the one where he talked about the rope and the backyard trauma.

Vaughn replied, not really making eye contact, "That never happened."

Stunned, and moving away to let the next fan get a chance, I said, "Well, I'm glad for that. Glad it was just...a story."

When he died I went back and read that Q&A again.

"That never happened."

Really? The interviewer made up the entire Q&A? It reads like a transcription. Who'd make up this stuff?

Frankly, I do know the world of pulp magazines and tabloids. I know how the twisting and slanting is done. I know the glee that editors feel in taking down a star via a load of crap or an unflattering photo. But the Vaughn piece was pretty damn convincing.

The interviewer being long dead, the trail was now cold. I couldn't ask, "So, you got an interview with a minor celebrity and, what, had to trick it up to make it worth printing? You invented all kinds of insane stuff and had the NERVE to present it in Q&A form? Really??"

I never had an excuse to interview Robert Vaughn, and to find out whether "A Fortunate Life" was revisionist history or the truth, or whether the entire Q&A was just the work of an incredibly inventive yellow journalist.

Robert Vaughn had a very interesting style as an actor. He was one of the few (Gene Barry was another) who presented himself as a reluctant hero. Like Gene Barry, Vaughn was the master of the scornful glare. His mouth would sometimes open in a kind of nauseous disgust and then close again, words unsaid. Vaughn's Napoleon Solo and Barry's Bat Masterson and Amos Burke loved the ladies but had a great ambivalence towards ones who came on too strong.

Was Vaughn's restrained acting style somehow tied to being tied up in that backyard as a child?

He said, "That never happened."

Tabloid journalism boldly done in Q&A format, and a lie? Or was "A Fortunate Life" an attempt to re-write history?

Thursday, November 10, 2016

Beggars Can't Be...MUSICIANS?

"Support the artist" is another term for "Have pity."

Because today, artists are reduced to begging. They can sit on the curb with a cup, as much as go to Facebook and Twitter with their pathetic pleas. "Be my Facebook friend...and come to my gig PLEASE." "Hey, Twitter fan, let me bribe you with a free download so you won't stop following me."

Remember when there were record labels and record stores? When self-entitled brats didn't smirk "Copyright is copy wrong?" When obnoxious "sharers" on blogs and forums didn't say "Thank ME for giving you all the albums FREEE?" At one time there were no smug Internet pirates collecting Kim Dotcom money and dismissing their thefts with: "If you LIKE it, buy it."

The "new paradigm" was: "The music should be free. Just buy a t-shirt...or if the artist does a gig, go to the gig...with your camcorder so you can record it and up it to YOUTUBE." That is, if the gig is nearby and you're not busy downloading the newest movie off a torrent. That is, if the item isn't a pdf or kindle or ePub file from a writer who DOESN'T gig and DOESN"T sell t-shirts. Fact is, most every artist is now having a tough time. The newest way to outwit the system? THE WORLD IS SAVED: Heeeere's PLEDGEMUSIC.COM.

You got nothing when you went begging on KICKSTARTER? You aren't seeing a good royalty from SPOTIFY or BANDCAMP? Let's try again. Just invest in paying for vinyl or limited edition CD, with posters and other things, and maybe autograph it or number it...then SELL IT. To somebody. Or other.

It seems PLEDGEMUSIC is aimed at has-beens and those who are on an indie label having been booted a long time ago from a surviving major one.

Right. Press up some MERCH and hope your dwindling fans feel like "supporting" you. Maybe they'll feel good about being no-talent drones when they "feel sorry" for the artist-beggar and buy something. As long as the artist is grateful and gives a personal THANKS in a TWEET.

Remember FASTBALL? Like so many bands, they had a good first or second album, and then a disappointing second or third. Then they disappeared. These guys want another chance. You got the disposable income? Like professional beggars, they'll offer a personalized and sincere THANK YOU.

FASTBALL and WENDY JAMES are competing with better known artists who have run dry.

Take antisemite Peter Gabriel. When was his last good song? His record label accountants began seeing red rain in the ink, and off he went on his "singing the oldies, see if you can recognize the fat fuck" tour. RICK WAKEMAN also has a dwindling fan base and has gone begging. At least, unlike Gabriel, he hasn't overtly demanded the destruction of Israel via sanctions, or falsely declared Israel to not only be apartheid, but the ONLY apartheid country on the planet. But both these guys, and many more, are trying to get people to buy their OLD stuff OVER again. PLEASE.

Hey, if you buy this clutter-crapola, you can go on your YouTube channel, and show everyone how you open the package with your pudgy paws, and then describe the goodies in detail. Then you pat yourself on the back for "supporting" the poor beggar, and really, who has the power now, the beggar or the "fan" with the drone dollars from that dull job?

Sorry, Pete, but I have your vinyl and it ain't scratched. I have your CD's too. And just because you're an ignorant racist swine, I do appreciate back when you were SENSITIVE, and I'll still play your music now and then. Hope you and Rick get those wrinkled egos salved with the grease of beg-induced bucks from the bozos.

Rick? Who wouldn't treasure a boxed set immortalizing his soundtrack to a 1925 silent film better heard via vintage traditional orchestration and available on any budget DVD?

You've noticed that most of this stuff is aimed at older music fans? This is because Millennials now expect everything FREEEEE, and don't like clutter. They don't value music, DVDs or books. It should be streamed. At best, it should be on a thumb drive. Go spend money for concert tickets maybe, or a bottle of smell, if the artist has a perfume deal, but BUY music? Hell no.

So, is PLEDGEMUSIC really "the new paradigm?" Of course not. Just because Dylan can sell a huge box set of old concerts or "official bootlegs," or Roger Waters' Pink Floyd, or the Rolling Stones or Neil Young, or McCartney, let's remember they all got MILLIONS to go play in the desert last month. They are the exceptions. Mostly, 60's and 70's progrockers are OLD, and their fans are worrying about paying medical bills, NOT collecting more shit that their grandchildren will toss in the trash. How much longer does a Rick Wakeman fan HAVE on this Earth? As his friends drop off or go into Alzheimers fog, who will that fan impress with that PHANTOM BOXED SET? How is it worth the asking price?

"Support the artist," comes the feeble voice. "Support the artist," the voice begs. But there's bills to pay. The social security check barely covers food. "Medicare does not cover everything." And so the artist keeps on begging, only to discover that the fans are downloading, enjoying the free streaming and the bootlegging and the piracy, and smirking, "Charity begins at home."

Friday, November 4, 2016

HATED HALLOWEEN CANDY

The 5th Day after Halloween is traditional.

It's the day when kids get down to the bottom of the bag, and have to eat the crap they've PUT OFF for SO LONG.

While the adults suffer with such upcoming miseries as the New York Marathon ("Keep going! You're Going GREAT! Woo Hoo!") and the Election ("NOBODY WINS...") the kids stare at dubious creations like "candy corn." They wonder, "is it better to eat lint?"

Yes.

Here's the list, but feel free to recall some hellish concoctions from YOUR past, like Sen-Sen, lilac-scented gum, hard bits of sugar "buttons" on rolls of paper, or nauseating "pixie stix" of pure sugar.

Shaw said "Youth is wasted on the young." Adults seem to know this, and so some of them waste very little money in filling up the trick-or-treat bag with cheap crap.

I must admit that I didn't have such great taste when I was a kid. I discovered at an obscure candy store, run by an old, old woman, packages of "Cherry Humps." Huh? What? I bought one. It was two cherries, "enrobed" in chocolate, and suspended in some kind of white nougat. Yum! It wasn't until many months later, when I bought a pack somewhere else, that I realized the "white nougat" was just liquid syrup gone stale.

Thursday, November 3, 2016

UNTITLED

I’ve written a poem with true vigor

It’s small and I can’t seem to do bigger

For all I can find

To rhyme the last line

Is mentioning actor Clu Gulager

Wednesday, November 2, 2016

L'chaim Van Morrison! CLOTHES MAKE THE VAN

What? You didn't know VAN MORRISON was Jewish?

His original group was THEM. Who do you think are always called THEM people?

Here's Van, now 71, joyously dancing with members of the tribe.

What? You think there's something phony here?

Well, yes. That's what I thought when I saw the original picture.

Surly Van's publicists and make-up people and fashion designers gussied him up and persuaded him to pose in order to promote a BLUES gig. The idea: he's not an OLDIES act, just because "Moondance" and "Gloria" were some 40 or 50 years ago. Nope. He's an authentic BLUES BROTHER, like, oh, Jim Belushi.

So they had him dressed up in a Blues Brother hat and jacket, a scarf, shades...striking a pose with his fists thumbs up, and a sullen pout. That's how a white guy seems black.

Oh those white people!

Then, make sure the band is full of blacks (especially on bass and drum, rhythm you know). Definitely avoid Hasids! Which is why I surrounded Van with them.

My late colleague Peter Dvrackas, who worked with me on the rock mag ROCKET, used to point out how much a Bonnie Tyler or a David Bowie owed to fashion and make-up. I've never forgotten it.

Without the ultra cool hat and the shades, Van Morrison is just a squinty bald guy.

Without the cool hat matching the jacket, and without the scarf, he's kind of a squat old nerd.

Without the pouty lips and the hipster clenched fists, he doesn't have that rockin' blues vibe. (Nevermind that this guy probably can't move his legs any better than your Uncle Max...the one that died 8 years ago).

The idea is that this honky who always sounded like a honking goose, is actually much blacker, much bluesier, than Muddy Waters or Blind Willie McTell or Robert Johnson or any of the other African-Americans that Van's fans never listen to and would never go see.

In fact, if you just transport Mr. Morrison to a Jewish setting, call him MR. MORRIS if you will, you see just how BLUESY he really is. Not much.

What's the phrase? Schmuck and Mirrors. It's hype. It's hair and make-up. It's creating an image.

In truth, Van Morrison and Paul Simon look pretty much alike, don't they? Two slightly pudgy, sullen little guys who want everyone to think they are hip.

Of course Paul surrounds himself with Africans in costume, as if, by osmosis, he can magically reflect some mojo. Yes, he can. If Van was posed with blacks on drum and bass (most definitely, rhythm you now) and there was some guy in a dashiki on guitar, he'd look truly BLUESY. Here, he just looks truly JEWSY, and, too bad, that's not a good image. And when was the last time anyone noted that Klezmer music is pretty jazzy stuff?? "We're all dressed up for a Moandance..."

Saturday, October 29, 2016

Google: Enforce the law and END THE YOUTUBE COVER SONG PLAGUE

You've noticed an annoyance on Copyright Violation Tube.

Er, make that Bootleg Tube. OK: YOUTUBE.

You're surfing (flexing, schmoozing, burglarizing) to find a favorite song you're too cheap to buy. But ten or twenty precious seconds are lost as you rummage through rubbish.

There's blurry cover versions done by dubious amateurs in their own homes. For some reason, they sit at a keyboard or strum a guitar, obviously STARING AT THE LYRICS, singing badly, playing badly, but they think YOU would like to watch.

Some are psycho.

Most of these YouTube mice could scare roaches.

A few, though, have been told they're PRETTY ENOUGH TO BE THE NEXT TAYLOR SWIFT.

Oops. Yeah, maybe the girl isn't bad looking, but after she starts singing, you hit MUTE.

And that's not all you want to HIT.

I mean that in a friendly, pushy, trollish, Trumpish way, of course. Since she's attractive and clueless, you figure you can hit on her by leaving a "nice" comment. Chicks dig a compliment, like: "you sing SOOOOOOOO beautifully. Really. I'm on Facebook and Twitter. I am rich, have connections in the music industry, and I'm not too old for you."

If you have a pointed head, just point the camcorder down a bit.

If you don't know how to work a camcorder too well and can't get the lighting right, well, maybe that's a good thing. See the unsightly guy below.

Something about YouTube draws the dregs of the world. This is their soap box. Or their toilet. They want to be discovered, and they should be; by the men in the white jackets.

Some people are just delusional egomaniacs.

WHY would they think YOU have nothing better to do than hear them plod their sticky, gecko-like fingers along the keys, barely hitting the right notes and singing in a thin, off-key voice? Especially when it's some song that you absolutely HATE?

The answer? It's obvious enough. Hey, Google Nazis, how about ENFORCING THE LAW?

Make sure your idiots sign up with a valid credit card. Make sure that if somebody RED FLAGS the video, you tell the idiot, "This will be taken down unless you can show us PROOF UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY that this is YOUR ORIGINAL WORK."

"If it's a cover version, SHOW US PROOF IT IS AUTHORIZED."

I just released my new album, HA HA HALLOWEEN and it's all originals. I discovered that my record label and all the suspects distributing my album (iTunes, Spotify, etc. etc.) required AUTHORIZATION for cover versions.

No problem about covering anybody's song, BUT the songwriter and publisher MUST KNOW. That's just a courtesy, even if the royalties are gonna be a very small hill of beans.

I was told, "You will have to go to the Harry Fox Agency and fill out forms, and let them know you are using the work, and submit records annually to show how many copies were sold and what their royalty is..." Huh?

YEAH. There's even such a thing as performance fees. Play a song in public, even free, and the writer and publisher STILL get paid.

On GooTube, it would be a good idea to enforce this law, if only to cut down on the amount of clutter on the site. It's pathetic enough that most every artist now is willing to settle for chump change on GooTube. In fact, they don't even GET chump change until a certain amount of "hits" are reached. You ain't seeing a nickel, literally, if your fantastic song only gets a thousand plays. Or is it five thousand.

Just as I can't do a cover version on an album unless I jump through a lot of hoops, GooTube singers should NOT be covering songs and torturing people (most of this stuff is barely worth one "so bad it's good" chuckle). If somebody is out of work and has nothing better to do than cover a song EVERY DAY, even if almost none of them are viewed beyond a very, very SMALL circle of friends, THAT person should do something else.

GooTube would be doing a public service in telling some of these people, "Nope, you can't cover peoples' songs without payment. Go work in a soup kitchen. Read to the blind. Or just go F- yourself."

As Bob Dylan sang it (and I can quote him as long as I'm only using a phrase), "Too much of nothing" is NOT a good idea.

This is TOO MUCH OF NOTHING

Thursday, October 6, 2016

Praying to God to STOP being God

People are throwing MEMES all over Twitter and Facebook. Like THIS:

The trending hashtag of the day: #PrayforFlorida.

NOT pray that Florida gets rid of the meth addicts, the rednecks or the psychos with automatic weapons. Pray to God that Florida survives an act of God.

Most of the time, I'm told not to question God, but this time, damn, I'm being told to do just that.

Pray. In other words, whine. If not an outright, "God, do NOT let the hurricane strike like you planned," then maybe some wheedling: "God, if you spare everyone, I promise not to download more slutty Jennifer Lawrence pictures off 4Chan."

Why am I being TOLD to PRAY by people I don't even know?

It's because it's not enough that religious fanatics are praying. They want EVERYONE to pray.

That's how religious fanatics are.

They want you to believe what they believe. In Islam, everyone's supposed to shoot Rushdie if they get a chance. The Ayatollah said so decades ago, and it still goes.

What, it's against your religion to kill a writer? Shame on you! Go ahead!

Yusuf Cat Stevens, Mr. Sensitive, was asked if he'd burn Rushdie in effigy. He said no, he'd rather burn the actual man. (Ewww, baby baby it's a wild world). One religion tells you to kill somebody who writes something or draws a cartoon.

Another religion says to question God and talk him out of a hurricane. Or rather, a BIG hurricane.

We've had hurricanes A through L so far this season, but M? M is massive, so let's call in all favors, and pester people on Facebook and Twitter: "PRAY FOR THOSE IN THE PATH OF HURRICANE MATTHEW!!!!!"

Trending on Twitter, and right alongside "If I had a Pet Dragon," too!

The phrase is "PRAY FOR FLORIDA." That's all. Everybody be religious. It's the 21st Century, but act like Druids. Pray. Don't look in on relatives, offer a spare room to somebody fleeing the hurricane, or donate to the Red Cross. No. Get on your knees and PRAY. Don't just do it yourself, order everyone to do it.

Hurricanes are horribly destructive. It's sad to see the news broadcasts about it. But WHY do sanctimonious assholes decide to pester total strangers with "PRAY!" memes? They really think that enough people PRAY, it will influence their basically soft-hearted God to get off that sudden destructive kick? And what caused it in the first place? God was mad Vanilla Ice got booted off "Dancing with the Stars?"

OK, I decided to help out. We're talking about HURRICANE MATTHEW, so that's a NEW TESTAMENT hurricane.

Rather than go to a mosque or a temple, I went to a church.

I looked up and said:

God, about this HURRICANE MATTHEW that you created. You work in mysterious ways. In your infinite wisdom you created a hurricane that is going to destroy property and kill random people.

I pray that you tone it down.

Scale it back.

If you were planning on doing TEN MILLION in damages, make it FIVE.

That kind of thing. Are you OK with that?

I hate to mention it, but I got the idea that you're a drama queen. The more awful things are, the more you like it, because you can call attention to yourself.

In other words, you're a lot like Piers Morgan.

Or are you? Prove it. Give me a sign.

Let the Muslims keep blowing shit up, but take this hurricane out to the Atlantic and let it whip up some sharks like a Waring blender. If you want to kill things, kill sharks.

Leave Florida alone! It's such a classy state. It's where telemarketers have their offices. It's got great Cuban sandwiches. People like to run over manatees with motor boats and shoot gators. Trump has a mansion there. And don't forget, it's got Disney World.

Have some CHRISTIAN CHARITY, for Chrissake.

Sunday, September 18, 2016

Harris Publications goes UP THE JUNCTION

"I got a job with Stanley. He said I'd come in handy."

SQUEEZE, "Up the Junction."

A few months ago Harris Publications went under. I hadn't heard about it till now (which gives you some idea of how important THIS news is. What, another newsstand mag company dying because everybody wants free digital content??)

The first job I had as an editor was at Harris. I freelanced for many magazines, including Countrywide (originally co-owned by Harris and Myron Fass) and then edited the rock mag ROCKET.

The New York Post:

One irony was that Harris was still publishing a hip-hop magazine. He no doubt figured that audience doesn't own a lot of computers. They still buy bootlegs off guys who spread out blankets on sidewalks, or cardboard boxes in front of bodegas.

Of course I would've felt pretty ridiculous hanging on over there, hacking my way through whatever titles fell into my lap, including hip-hop titles and "Juicy" gossip mags aimed at cretins.

How sad for some who DID stay there for 3 decades or more, to the bitter end. Pensions, anyone? I don't think so. A stack or two of yellowing hairdo magazines in the closet to show for your life?

Well, I can see it for a few people I recall over there, who liked a comfy, ordinary and predictable lifestyle. But why not just take a government job printing pamphlets or something? You would've gotten a pension and been retired already.

Over the decades, I never thought of "dropping in" and seeing how Stan Harris was doing. I barely knew what was going on over there, except that they'd acquired "Eerie" and "Vampirella" when Warren Publishing went bankrupt. It turned out, via a Jim Warren lawsuit, that they DIDN'T acquire "Eerie" after all. But Stan Harris did do very well for many years with "Vampirella," and an expanded collection of comic books to replace such vintage items as "Teen Spectacular" and the adult "He and She," both edited by my friend Peter Dvrackas.

So. Today I had nothing better to do than wonder, "What's with Harris Publications?" I don't recall what word association got me to Googling, but when I did, I discovered the company is, to use British slang from that Squeeze song, "Up the Junction." Kaput. As in this from FOLIO:

BILLBOARD actually mentioned the modest magazine empire of Mr. Harris, using a generic Getty Images photo of a closing office door. For a moment I thought, "Is that Phyllis Goldstein?"

Stan Harris surprised his staff by shutting down with just one day's notice. He told 'em on Thursday that they had to gather up their stuff and be GONE by Friday. That's sort of standard operating procedure, isn't it, so that the employees don't have time to strip the place bare?

It sounds heartless but Harris Publications was basically a "family run" outfit and, at least early on, not known for being mean. I don't recall any firings and just the usual backbiting animosity and Machiavellian pettiness. The former I recall centering on a now well-known gay gossip columnist who at the time was a white-shirted nerd trying to climb up by demanding access to my rock and Peter's entertainment world connections. He was the assistant to a repulsive old crone who liked wearing low-cut blouses revealing cleavage that resembled two clumps of string cheese. You looked because it was a train wreck, but she appreciated it just the same. He and the crone were not above spreading rumors.

As for Machiavellian pettiness, one employee had a pudgy, precocious daughter of about 13, who should've been in school a lot more often than pestering me. She'd come by with a smirk, pick up a bunch of incoming promo record packages, and coyly say, "YOU don't need THESE, do you?" My stock line is, "I don't know till I open them, and I'm not opening them now. When I do, they'll go to the record reviewers. You can take THESE if you want..."

I'd point to the shelf of "anyone can grab these" albums, which she never bothered to look at. To get on her good side (because Daddy was important in the company) I did what I could to keep her happy. "I'd LOVE to see Eric Clapton..." she said, in the kind of grand manner that inspires effeminate homosexuals to copy the worst traits of the opposite sex.

I wasn't going to the show myself, and hadn't assigned anyone, but I called in a favor with the record label, got the "plus one" tickets so she could go to the Nassau Coliseum. My reward, a week or two later, was that her Daddy had gone to Stanley Harris to say I wasn't running the magazine right: "My daughter says he's picking the wrong acts for the cover, and there's hardly anything that she likes."

The magazine was selling well. I didn't have much response that would've been good office politics, so I just assured Stan I appreciated the input. And that the way most of the 100 pages were divided, was to give the space to whoever was on the charts, not on any one person's personal opinion.

I suppose my first experience with changing trends (as opposed to inept business practices, which often sent minor magazine companies into bankruptcy) was when KISS faltered. You couldn't just put 'em on the cover and get sales. Punk and disco were getting popular and neither translated into magazine sales too well. Always a cautious fellow, Harris decided to quit while ahead.

He shelved the newest issue, which was just about to go to the printer. Sorry, Gene Simmons, Nick Lowe, Genya Ravan, etc. etc. He offered me Peter's men's mags. I declined, as I didn't want to take work away from Peter. So Stan hired someone else and Peter was eased out. My parting with Harris was amicable, although I did run into the circulation guy whose daughter had backstabbed me, and to his surprise, I told him what I thought of him AND his daughter.

Fast forward through the good and bad comments left at the news of the end of an era:

Harris Publications was a niche market, and he wisely played it conservative. Yes, as you walked through the place, you would find some boring drones working on hairdo magazines, second-rate adventure stuff, and hacky entertainment efforts, but most of it served a purpose and offended nobody. Well, my stuff and Peter's stuff sometimes did, which Stanley viewed warily. Peter would add a bit of kink to the men's titles and the first issue of ROCKET offered Debbie Harry nude (quite a coup for us), which got us banned on some newsstands. The second issue had a topless shot of Amanda Lear which likewise rankled some conservatives.

Stanley was not too interested in making waves, unlike his flamboyant ex-partner Myron Fass, but I didn't think that was such a bad thing. Not "such a prize?" He was ok. With only a few exceptions, so were most of the staffers and editors.

One irony was that eventually, amid the gossip mags, decorator and hairstyle tomes and comic books, Harris was known for a lot of gun magazines. The irony is that the legendary split between Myron Fass and Stanley Harris (who were co-owners of Countrywide Publications) included an in-office pistol whipping. Harris emerged bloody from an encounter with the never-stable Myron. This effectively split the company. Harris took half the titles and formed his own group. Fass, a fat and unpleasant maniac, soon belly-flopped into bankruptcy on his own.

Fast would often wear a gun around the office. I remember, when I was freelancing for Countrywide, he once dropped by an editor's cubicle while I was there, stared at me, and asked the editor, "Should we kill him?" The editor mildly said, "No, he's always on time with his stories. I need him." Fass's gun was at eye level as I sat.

So, Harris eventually had all these niche gun magazines, which apparently were quite beloved.

One gun fancier reported on the sad disappearance of the titles:

I do believe in the 2nd Amendment, to the extent that if someone likes shooting ducks out of the sky for kicks, they can do it as their conscience (or lack of same) dictates. Likewise, if you feel insecure, and you want a gun under your pillow, and you don't think someone else will get a hold of it, ok. Harris probably felt these considerations made it easy to ignore that much of gun manufacturing involves semi-automatic weapons that serve no other purpose than to maim and kill innocent people. He probably also figured that John Lennon being gunned down by a fat slob who easily got a weapon was, well one of those things.

I kind of wonder if Stanley, who kept a very low profile, actually showed up at gun-nut conventions, or joined his editors in cheerfully wandering around a gun show. I wonder if his thoughts ever traveled back to the days when his partner walked around with a gun at the office, threatened people, and ultimately tried to put a few ounces of metal up his nose.

I wrote a magazine in tribute to the slain John Lennon. I didn't do it for Harris.

It was for one of his long-gone competitors. Give the man credit. While the infamous names such as Traub, Zentner, Fass, Goldstein and Goodman (Chip) vanished, Harris did not. His shrewd knowledge of which mags could exist on circulation alone, or on minimal ads, kept him around long after most of the others had filed bankruptcy.

Any thought I had about what a nice, safe life I would've had if I stayed, ended when I noticed via "Glass Window" that nobody had a raise in the past 7 years, and the workload seemed to get worse. Most of the mags were dull, middle-America craft items, many with their own websites. Romantic-Country dot com for this safety sterile item:

So who would I be talking to up there? Middle-aged women checking over cover-lines about hairstyles and comforters? Some nut doing sports? Some aggressive chicks promoting guns? At least the latter swiftly found work elsewhere.

What have we learned from all this? That time moves along. That the publishing world is getting worse. That people don't want to buy anything or have anything on shelves when it can be downloaded FREE and stored on a CLOUD.

Some ex-employees have some good memories. And so it goes.

No, none of the above clips are anything I wrote. Especially not this one.

SOME people found it a nice place to stay. Two women from my days at ROCKET were there at the end (along with Harris himself, of course).

Yep, another Harris mag with its own website. And, what, no photos anywhere of Stanley, Phyllis or Mary. In fact, if you Google the guy, you're more likely to find a photo of his insane, now-deceased ex-partner Fass.

No. No more mags like THIS, which out-lasted ROCKET by far, and were prized while Stan dispensed with the men's mags as fast as he could:

I added the images of the mags, and clips from various websites as "cut and paste" material. Sort of a tribute to much of what they did at Harris Publications.