What? What?
If it wasn't for Pedophilia, the giant soul-sucking companies like Google (owner of Blogspot and YouTube) would truly be able to do anything their Fascist Nazi hearts desired.
Think about it. Hitler was able to gas any Jews he didn't kick out of the country. Why? Because nobody could accuse him of Pedophilia. Anything Germany did was ok, as long as they didn't cross THAT line.
And THAT line, according to the media, is being crossed all the time on YOUTUBE. Yes, yes, while the infamous Aqualung (of the Jethro Tull song) had to go outside to the park and playground, to enjoy "watching as the frilly panties" were exposed to his evil eyes, all the dirty old men (or ANY men, including Jared of Subway, who might have an Internet connection in jail) can see lurid images that are a bit too much of a pedo turn-on.
Let's read all about it:
YOUTUBE is a NIGHTMARE not only for those who don't approve of pedophiles, but those who don't approve of perverts in general. There's no shortage of DIRTY VIDEOS on YOUTUBE. You name the topic and type it in. It'll be there. You'll find perverts showing off their favorite fetishes and eagerly asking for YOU to make contact with them, and join the fun or BUY some products.
YOUTUBE is so perverse that people can routinely upload COPYRIGHTED material, openly STATE that it's COPYRIGHTED, and nothing happens. The TV show or the music is tossed onto YOUTUBE with the ridiculous disclaimer: "I don't own copyright. I just want people to enjoy this! Copyright belongs with the owner."
Duh, isn't the point of copyright so that the OWNER makes all decisions about its use? Red flag the item and YOUTUBE will ignore you. OR, you'll get a tart remark: "If you are the copyright owner, jump through our hoops, spend a half hour of your life, and we MIGHT remove the item. PS, we'll actually leave the item up and put a FROWN FACE on it, and let the world know YOU spoiled the fun. That way YOU can be harassed by vigilante overgrown brats."
YOUTUBE, unlike EBAY for example (not to give THEM much credit) does NOT understand what "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY" means. A famous actress I know was treated to a ridiculous and insulting video "tribute" in which stolen clips were repeated over and over (like a rap song), making her seem like a stuttering moron. I made a simple request of YOUTUBE. Take this DOWN.
I gave them the usual "I have a good faith belief...." line, but unlike every place else, I was told, "Use our form for copyright abuse." I did. My claim was rejected: "This is not a copyright problem." I wrote back: "I KNOW IT ISN'T. It's "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY." Nobody has the right to use her image, and even "monetize" for profit, without her consent." I was told, "If this is an invasion of privacy issue, use THIS form." I wrote back: "DON'T YOU HAVE A FORM FOR "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY?" No. "We have received your complaint regarding privacy, and if we find in your favor, we will let you know." When? Any time soon? And what if you DON'T think so? You expect us to spend hundreds of dollars on a lawyer, so you can then shrug and remove the item?
The only thing keeping arrogant Internet weasels in check these days is PEDOPHILIA.
Oh, oh, the children. THE CHILDREN! It's ok to steal everyone's music. It's ok to hack a woman's computer and throw her nude photos all over the Internet. It's ok on eBay to bootleg ebooks and sell used underwear and get $19.95 for a fake nude photo of a celebrity that some jerk in Kentucky says is real. BUT...please do report any image that involves nude children, even if it's in a nudist magazine. Lord knows, pervs buy nudist magazines for the kiddie pix."
When will the line blur on PEDO PORN? The answer is, it already has. You remember Jon Benet Ramsey? What in the world was a little girl doing all tarted up like that? The result was that she was brutally and sexually attacked. And killed. Anyone learn from that? No, not really.
YOUTUBE is now frantic over Pedophilia because...because of MONEY, that's all. It's because some people have complained to advertisers: "Why are you putting ads on kiddie porn images?" And the advertisers are saying to YOUTUBE, "Why did you place our ads on THAT stuff??"
Google, owner of YOUTUBE, isn't quite so concerned when it comes to their infamous search engine. It isn't quite so concerned with its Blogspot (where hundreds if not thousands of smug weasels offer free porn downloads AND proudly offer THOUSANDS of illegal music links.)
It's almost amusing that in the past few days, Google has been CENSORING new uploads. If the word "sexy" is in it, if the word "hot" is in it, if just about a thousand other terms trip the bots, the uploader gets a stern message: "This item can't be monetized because our advertisers may find it objectionable. Tick this box if you feel the item actually is not offensive, and we will review it."
Thanks to Pedophilia, an eccentric old Australian folk singer sits in the clink, and may die there. What did he do? He patted a girl on the rump or something? He wasn't Jared of Subway, paying for underage prostitutes. But...there's hope. There's hope that PEDOPHILIA won't be such a taboo. I give you the man running for Senator from Alabama, Roy Moore. He is currently LEADING in the polls. President Trump supports him.
Last week a few idiot ADULT women grumped that Al Franken touched their butts, and he nearly was forced to resign. Moore, who has been named by what, a DOZEN women, as having solicited them as teenagers...is happily ready to be a U.S. Senator, just like Al Franken. And damn, in Alabama, what IS the legal age for marriage? 12? Let's remember, say Moore's fans, that Jerry Lee Lewis married a girl who was well under the age of 16. So...
So Pedophilia, to quote a line from pudgy E.L. James, is now involving "shades of gray." An 8 year-old jumping up and down in her underoos on YouTube might be bad. A 14 year-old doing it...why, she could be adorably pinched by uncle Ray Moore and nobody will say SHUCKS.
YOUTUBE is run by Google, one of the wealthiest companies in the world. Aside from Facebook and Amazon, can you name an Internet company YOU would rather have stock in? They can afford to do better. They SHOULD do better. It's pathetic that only the wrath of advertisers is making them blink.
It's also pathetic that all they are doing is blinking. Let's remember that arrogant Google has paid millions of dollars in fines from European countries because it's cheaper to do that than to be honest. The RIAA and GEMA and IFPI haven't put any pressure on Google to make YOUTUBE less of a free jukebox and download center, and Universal, NBC, CBS, ABC and the rest are likewise not demanding that Google stop allowing idiots to upload things with a silly "I don't own copyright" caveat.
But how NICE to know that you might NOT be able to see lurid pictures of little boys and girls anymore. Most anything else on the Kraft-Ebing hit parade is just fine....
And how old IS this idiot dancing in Underoos?
Hey Mr. Moore, soon-to-be-senator in Alabama, you wanna MARRY THIS YOUNG 'UN???
No comments:
Post a Comment